References |
percent, along with a corresponding increase in penetration values. It became evident that the rejuvenator could work in Travis County. The use of a rejuvenator was of most interest as product cost was one-third to one-half the cost of the closest alternate, which would be a wear course seal. Using that alternative, the condition of |
several days ahead of the application, and to-date there has been a 95 percent success rate in clearing the streets of vehicles prior to application. The subdivision streets are vacuum- swept in 24 to 48 hours after application. A bonus is that because the rejuvenator does not contain asphalt, coal tar base or gilsonite, any tracking |
is kept to a minimum with little or no residential complaints. Factual examples of core data testing are shown in the accompanying table. Travis County and Pavement Restoration, Inc. have led by example and are showing other Texas municipal agencies their method of extending pavement life at a low cost.
|
the F mix—along with the many miles of inventory—would have deeply impacted the county budget (wear course seals being chip or Type 1 and 2 slurry are placed on more severely distressed pavements in the county). PROGRAM COMMENCES Starting in 2006, Ward and Travis County went forward with a program of rejuvenating 35 to 50 miles per year. The project was let to bid with a tight set of specifications, as the county knew what it wanted to achieve. Any remedial hot pour rubber crackfilling work was to be done four to eight weeks ahead of the application. In 2008 the program was in its third year. Work is performed during June to August, when ambient temperatures are 65 to 85 deg F (18 to 30 deg C). The rejuvenating emulsion is applied at application rates of 0.07 to 0.08 gallons per square yard, diluted 2 parts product to 1 part water (0.32 to 0.36 liters/sq. meter). A washed concrete sand is used as a blotter at a rate of 1 to 2 lbs. per sq. yard (0.45 to 0.90 kg/sq. meter). The sand blots any rejuvenator that has not fully penetrated the surface. The rejuvenating emulsion breaks or cures in about 40 minutes. Typically two to three streets are done at the same time, half of the road per application. Traffic control is maintained by the contractor. Door knockers are used to advise residents |
On Travis County, Tex., pavements, the top three-eights inch of each core was removed for testing. The asphalt was extracted and recovered as prescribed by California Test Method 365 (CTM 365). Viscosities were determined on the recovered asphalt binder using a sliding plate microviscometer (CTM 348). Penetrations were calculated from a nomograph. |
|
Microviscosity, 25ºC, MP |
Equivalent |
|
Sample Identification |
0.05 sec-1 |
0.001 sec-1 |
Penetration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bent Bow Drive |
|
|
|
Before |
89.0 |
128 |
11 |
After |
46.0 |
78.5 |
15 |
Crystal Mountain |
|
|
|
Before |
21.0 |
35.9 |
21 |
After |
8.98 |
10.5 |
31 |
Green Emerald |
|
|
|
Before |
298 |
355 |
6 |
After |
16.5 |
22.6 |
24 |
Grimes Ranch Road |
|
|
|
Before |
44.0 |
60.0 |
15 |
After |
12.4 |
42.0 |
28 |
Kratzman Drive |
|
|
|
Before |
28.0 |
54.0 |
19 |
After |
9.60 |
13.2 |
32 |
Scull Creek Drive |
|
|
|
Before |
37.5 |
50.0 |
17 |
After |
9.89 |
14.3 |
32 |
Summer Court |
|
|
|
Before |
97.5 |
106 |
10 |
After |
55.5 |
76.0 |
14 |
Wavecrest Blvd |
|
|
|
Before |
82.0 |
137 |
11 |
After |
13.9 |
15.0 |
27 |
Westminister Glen |
|
|
|
Before |
54.2 |
86.4 |
14 |
After |
37.8 |
79.9 |
17 |
Winchester Road |
|
|
|
Before |
118 |
164 |
10 |
After |
14.3 |
19.9 |
26 |
Yarrow Court |
|
|
|
Before |
68.0 |
85.2 |
12 |
After |
19.0 |
22.0 |
23 |